My friend Verlon taught me many lessons. One of the most interesting was how he and his wife negotiated. Each Sunday evening they would sit down to divide up the household chores such as shopping, cleaning and cooking for the coming week. Each chore had a coefficient. Each week they would negotiate who would do what on the basis of time and availability. Each week they would come up with a satisfactory list of how the household chores would be done with similar totals for each.
Donald Trump’s first 100 days as the 45th president of the United States are fast approaching. He continues to fascinate, startle and amaze. He orders the bombing of Syrian aircraft, dines with the president of China and welcomes a new Supreme Court justice all in 24 hours. A whirlwind of activity by a true multitasker.
Roger Federer is a phenomenon. He has won more Grand Slam tournaments than any male tennis player in history. He has won the Davis Cup; he has an Olympic gold medal. And at 35, he won the last Grand Slam in January in Australia after a six month layoff and the two major non-Grand Slam tournaments this year. He has 91 tournament victories after Sunday’s win in Miami. All this is phenomenal. He also appears a devoted husband and father. He is a true role model in addition to his tennis prowess.
When my friends refer to me as “Doctor Warner,” I know I am in trouble. They are mocking my Ph.D. Indeed, democracies are based on the equality of citizens. Each qualified person has the same vote whether or not they have degrees in political science, listen to the news or read several newspapers a day. My friends are gently reminding me that “one man, one vote” means just that. We are all equal.
Chuck Berry and Jimmy Breslin died last week. Berry, an icon of rock ‘n roll, was globally known for hits like “Johnny B. Goode” and “Roll Over Beethoven” He was the first true rock ’n’ roll superstar. Breslin was a superstar to New Yorkers, especially to those who looked forward to reading his byline to find out what was behind the news. He was also idolized by fellow writers.
Do women’s rights mean the same thing in New York and Jeddah? Are individual rights a Western concept opposed by collective rights in Africa? Is advocating for human rights a form of hegemony by the United States and its allies? Why are economic, social and cultural rights prioritized by certain countries while civil and political rights are prioritized by others in spite of the fact that they are supposed to be interdependent?
Donald Trump likes to tweet. Donald Trump likes to attack. Like many New Yorkers, he believes that the best defense is to be offensive. He has attacked the media as “enemies of the people;” he has attacked the intelligence services. He has now attacked a former president, Barack Obama. And he did this in an early morning tweet.
A Chinese curse says “May he live in interesting times.” In a 1966 speech, Senator Robert F. Kennedy said: “Like it or not, we live in interesting times. They are times of danger and uncertainty; but they are also the most creative of any time in the history of mankind.” Are we living out the Chinese curse or are we living in “the most creative of any time in the history of mankind”?
The first weeks of Donald Trump’s presidency have been exciting, to say the least. Veteran Senator John McCain described the White House as being a place where “nobody knows who’s in charge and nobody knows who’s setting policy.” The head of the military’s Special Operations Command said publicly: “Our government continues to be in unbelievable turmoil. I hope they sort it out because we’re a nation at war.”
Roger Federer gave us a brief respite from the Trump news, but the thrill of his victory will only last so long. Other memories will remain etched much longer because people do remember where and how people stood at certain moments. In spite of the fact that we live in a world of tweets, where history has been reduced to the last 15 seconds on a Reuters screen, there is a collective memory, at least for some. In special moments, what elected officials do can leave a lasting impression, even if it does not change the course of history.
Under the radar in Geneva, but an ominous foreboding of things to come, a bill was introduced into the U.S. House of Representatives on January 3 calling for the disengagement of the United States from the United Nations. The bill, H.R. 193 – known as American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017 – has been referred for deliberations to the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Donald Trump lives in the impulsive world of Twitter. While tweets do put him in closer contact with the general population, the Twitter world he favors is an uncritical sphere inhabited by those who have no critical capacity for levels of analysis. Watching him during his recent press conference was to watch someone with few powers of reflection. He does not weigh his words; he has instant reactions. He is not critical.
Influencing elections in foreign countries is part of power politics. While the recent Russian scandal involves hacking and modern devices, it does not change the basic idea of countries helping those they prefer get to power. In the most recent example of this tradition, the American intelligence community issued a declassified report on Russian intervention in the November U.S. presidential election. After leaders of the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency testified before Congress, the agencies released a report which said that “Putin and the Russian government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.”
Trying to be positive in the cold, dark haze of snowless Geneva, anxiously anticipating the January 20th inauguration of Donald J. Trump as the 45th President of the United States and all that will follow, continuing to be overwhelmed by pictures of the carnage in Syria and the unfolding denial of hospitality towards those fleeing violence, shocked at random attacks against innocent people in the name of a religion that purports to be humane, one searches for momentary relief and reasons to smile as 2017 begins.
The object of capitalism is the accumulation of capital. That’s obvious. What is not obvious is the relationship between an economic system and a political one. While capitalism may drive how countries organize their economies, political systems are supposed to be separate. Democracy and capitalism are not the same.
With the Christmas season and New Year’s Eve upon us, you may feel particularly sensitive about invitations. Why was I not invited to this party? Why was so-and-so invited? In fact, although this is the season to be generous and altruistic, distinctions between insiders and outsiders cannot be ignored. Sending cards and inviting for festivities involve making choices. It is often intriguing to note who was not invited.
The dizzying unfolding of the post-November 8 election results in the United States continues. As the buildup to the Electoral College vote on December 19 approaches, there is uncertainty about how to react to the results. Grass-root protests, boycotts of the Inauguration and planned marches are in the works. Recounts in several states like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, allegations of Russian hacking, condemnations of the C.I.A. by the President-elect, Clinton’s substantial popular vote majority, and Trump’s ethical conflicts of interest all contribute to this uncertainty not seen in presidential elections since George Bush v Al Gore in 2000.
The Escalade race is said to represent “the best of the Spirit of Geneva…,” “Geneva at its highest,” according to Pierre Ruetschi in the Tribune of December 4. He wrote that 40,000 people running in numerous categories and a thousand volunteers all contributed to “a remarkable collective effort.”
The recent votes for Brexit and Donald Trump as well as populist movements in Europe reflect an anti-globalization backlash. There is no question that rising unemployment and the technological revolution have caused insecurity. People are afraid for their jobs; millions are worried about the future. Many in democratic countries fear increasing instability.
The unexpected result of the November 8 election in the United States continues to have aftershocks. And they will continue for a long time. Just as the implosion of the Soviet Union, September 11, 2001 attacks and the Arab Spring changed world politics, the election of Donald Trump represents a transformative event.
I admit it; I blew it. I was convinced that Hillary Clinton would win. The election of Donald Trump is the culmination of a series of mistakes by experts, media, pollsters, politicians and diplomats. In other words, the intellectual class got it all wrong. But not only did it get it wrong on this election, it also got it wrong in predicting the end of the Soviet Union and the Arab Spring. 0 for 3; in baseball terms three strikes means you’re out.
This demands serious reflection.
As the bombing of Aleppo continues and the fighting around Mosul intensifies, Western leaders and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights have denounced blatant violations of international humanitarian law. Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein, the High Commissioner, recently condemned the indiscriminate bombing of civilians in eastern Aleppo as possible war crimes. While no official figures are available, the United Nations has said that nearly 200 civilians have been killed by the Islamic State outside Mosul. A photographer for The New York Times wrote almost a full-page story in the October 27 edition about being wounded while accompanying Iraqi counter terrorism forces pushing towards Mosul. The horrors of the wars in Iraq and Syria are being more than documented.
The former Speaker of the United States House of Representatives Tip O'Neill is credited with saying “All politics is local.” But how local can you get? The recent vote in Wallonia, Belgium, against the European Union (EU) - Canada trade deal has led to Belgium’s withdrawing support and the potential collapse of the deal. The local parliament voted against the agreement, and since all 28 EU member countries must sign a trade agreement, Belgium has effectively vetoed the deal. The 27 other members of the EU were on board.
The US presidential campaign continues to sink lower and lower. Personal insults – “Lock her up” – and revelations about sexual misconduct – both about Donald Trump and references to Bill Clinton – have hampered any serious discussion about major issues. What to do in Syria? How to overcome income inequality and racial tensions? While neither candidate has stayed completely on the high road, there is no question that Donald Trump has been in the forefront of the personal attacks.
Besides cuckoo clocks, chocolate and watches, Switzerland is world renowned for direct democracy within its political system. At the federal level, citizens can propose changes to the constitution through initiatives or ask for a referendum on any law passed by the parliament. Swiss citizens are more powerful than citizens in representative democracies such as the United States. This rule by the people is greatly admired, and certainly more democratic than the American system by which nine judges on the Supreme Court can eventually rule a law unconstitutional.