Can Swiss business and human rights co-exist?

Imprimer

Doing business with other countries and promoting human rights can and do go hand in hand, Swiss State Secretary for Foreign Affairs Pascale Baeriswyl recently told swissinfo.ch. According to Baeriswyl, the future Swiss Ambassador to the UN in New York and the woman in charge of writing the country’s foreign policy strategy for the near future, “you cannot sustainably have good business and economic relations if a country is in dire domestic shape. In most cases economic relations do not contradict other foreign policy goals.”
 

What is the relationship between business and human rights? In a transactional world – the world of Donald Trump – the economic benefits of business far outweigh human rights concerns. At best, business cooperation can lead to better understanding and eventually to changes in human rights policies. This is the reasoning often given when businesses work in countries with poor human rights records and environmental policies.
And following such logic, Swiss President Ueli Maurer has visited Russia, China, Saudi Arabia and Kazakhstan in what has been labelled his “2019 autocrat world tour.” In response to criticism over these countries’ poor human rights records, he has said that while promoting Swiss economic interests are a priority, especially in his role as finance minister, he has also raised human rights issues and adherence to international law during each visit. The neutral role of Switzerland adds strength to that argument.
In Geneva, an increasing number of platforms are seeking to bring human rights and business together and go beyond the transactional relationship. The Center for Business and Human Rights just opened at the University of Geneva. A network for sustainable finance has also been launched. These platforms are more than just philanthropy or altruism. They are part of a wave of interest in overcoming the separation of business from human rights or larger ethical issues, and part of the movement demanding more corporate social responsibility.
But the standoff between two Geneva-based international organizations shows that the relationship between business and labor policy remains a difficult one: the World Trade Organization (WTO), which aims to ensure countries abide by rules promoting fair trading practices, and the International Labor Organization (ILO), which deals with workers’ rights. Attempts have been made to bring the two institutions together through a so-called social clause to integrate several core labor standards into trade agreements, but this has not been successful. In fact, several years ago an official at the ILO told me that one couldn’t even organize a friendly soccer game between the staffs of the two organizations.
What about Switzerland? Can it thread the needle of promoting economic interests while adhering to neutrality and to its values as a defender of human rights and humanitarian law?
The role of Switzerland in the recent exchange of prisoners between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran is a successful reminder of the bridge-building capacity of a small country. But when the State Secretary says that “clashes between doing business and promoting human rights in the world is ‘overrated,’” is she speaking for Muslims in China like the Uighurs? Or for the murder and dismembering of the Saudi Arabian journalist Jamal Khashoggi? The list goes on.
Swiss Ambassador to Washington Jacques Pitteloud said in a recent television interview that the United States and Switzerland had a common history of shared values. One hopes that those values are deeper than merely transactional ones.
 
Lien permanent 6 commentaires

Commentaires

  • "Doing business with other countries and promoting human rights can and do go hand in hand, Swiss State Secretary for Foreign Affairs Pascale Baeriswyl recently told swissinfo.ch. According to Baeriswyl, the future Swiss Ambassador to the UN in New York"
    Pascale Baeriswyl, socialiste très socialiste nommée par le crypto-socialiste Burkhalter, a fait fuir de très nombreuses personnes du DFAE. Source : une ambassadeur de Suisse. Cassis a été très mal inspiré de la nommer aux NU. C'est probablement sa seule erreur politique jusqu'ici...

  • When President Simonetta Sommaruga will assist the G20 summit in Saudi Arabia next year, her main goal will of course be the promotion of socialist values.

  • J'aime beaucoup l'humour de Bruno Hubacher.

  • Oui, me too Géo.

  • Il est parfois de bon ton de mettre en doute l`humanisme suisse du fait de l`importance traditionnelle du commerce et de la banque dans la détermination de la politique étrangere du pays. Je me permets de faire remarquer que la Suisse n`a jamais prétendu etre la patrie des droits de l`homme mais n`a jamais non plus pratiqué l`esclavage ou le génocide. Les USA, avec Thomas Jefferson, ont mis les "droits inaliénables accordés aux hommes par le Créateur" (comme on disait a l`époque) au centre de leur Déclaration d`indépendance (1776) mais ont aussi rédigé l`Indian Removal Act un demi siecle plus tard (1830) qui fut "the first formalized case of ethnic cleansing" selon l`expression de Brzezinski (2012).

  • La question de la coexistence du respect des droits de l`homme et des contraintes de la réalité, notamment la réalité économique, se pose pour tous les pays qui reconnaissent les droits de l`homme. Il vaut la peine de lire a cet égard le dernier roman de Don Winslow "The Border" qui montre bien comme cette coexistence forcée peut aboutir a une grave dissonnance cognitive dans une nation (les USA) ou les droits de l`homme et les affaires sont d`importance égale dans l`identité nationale.

Écrire un commentaire

NB : Les commentaires de ce blog sont modérés.

Optionnel